How to develop color negatives in C-41, the easy way

 

From the train, Kershaw 120

One of the best reason to still shooting film is the ability to use negative color film. It has been perfected for decades, and now is at the vertex of its evolutive path. For this reason you can shoot on amazing films like Ektar – to name but one – that give you beautiful colors and extremely small grain.

 

The problem

Problem is: good labs, especially if you don’t happen to live in a very big city and / or don’t trust the postal service with your precious pictures, are getting few and expensive. It’s much more common to get back the films all scratched and full of dust, with someone even sending back the negatives uncut and just rolled up and locked with a wristband – yes, it happened to me!

The obvious choice at this point would be developing the films at home. But, unlike black and white developers that are pretty much easygoing in terms of temperatures involved, C-41 – the name of the chemical process used to develop color negative films – is quite tricky. In theory, it requires you to maintain a temperature of 38 °C / 100.4 °F ± 0.3 °C during the entire process. A 0.3 °C margin is restrictive enough, but the real problems here springs from the 38 °C temperature. It is a really difficult threshold to maintain. During most of the year the water you use for the processing and the stock chemicals will be both at a much lower temperature.

To have the bottles of chemicals and the tank reaching 38 °C you will have to immerse them in hot water in some kind of basin or tray – and they will tend to float. But how will you be able to stop the heating process exactly at 38 °C? And what will happen when the water in the basin will starting to cool down? Yeah, you can add more hot water, but let’s be honest: there is no way you can control the temperature in a ± 0.3 °C range without an expensive and bulky color processor. And no, an aquarium heater is not a viable alternative. In many forum I read about this suggestion, but guess what: even setting aside the fact that it would lack the necessary precision, the goal of an aquarium heater is to let the fishes survive – duh! – so it will not run hotter than 32° C / 89.6° F; as you can see not hot enough by a long shot.

Pino Collito

The solution

So what, we give up? No way! There is an alternative, and if you have read some previous post of mine you may start guessing what I’m referring to: stand development at room temperature.

Yes, exactly like a black and white film. And that is possible mostly because the first developer of a C-41 process is, in fact, just a plain black and white developer. It is the next phase, the bleach or bleach-fix in some kits (blix for friends and family) that will remove the metallic silver and, so to speak, make the colors appear.

I first read about this technique on Lomography and I’m using it with just a couple changes. The results I’m getting are just plain great, without the awful and unpredictable color shifts caused by the imperfect control of time-temperature when trying to develop the films by the book at 38 °C.

 

The instructions

So let’s cut to the chase; these are the steps you need to follow to develop color negatives at home:

 

VARIATION 2 baths (for example: Tetenal C-41 kit)

Pre-soak = 3m (no agitation)
Developer = 45m (1m continuous agitation at first)
1st wash = 3m (changing the water every 30s)
Blix = 60m (1m continuous agitation at first)
Final wash = Ilford-style
Stabilizer = 1m (no agitation)

 

VARIATION 3 baths (for example: Rollei C-41 kit)

Pre-soak = 3m (no agitation)
Developer = 45m (1m continuous agitation at first)
1st wash = 3m (changing the water every 30s)
Bleach = 60m (1m continuous agitation at first)
2nd wash = 3m (changing the water every 30s)
Fixer = 1m continuous agitation and then 10s every minute for the amount of time given in the instructions
Final wash = Ilford-style
Stabilizer = 1m (no agitation)

 

Keep in mind that if your tap water is way colder than room temperature, say 5 or more °C degrees, like it happens in winter at my place, you should bring it to more or less room temperature or, better still, around 20 °C / 68 °F. No need for precision, just use the mixer faucet!

Strada delle Vette, Pentax ME Super 40mm pancake

Notes

Pre-soak
Just plain water. It swells the emulsion leaving it prepared to receive the developer and removes the anti-halo layer – this is why the water will come out of the tank with an heavy coloration.

1st wash
You could actually avoid this step, but it makes the blix last longer – and probably gives you better colors too, even though this is controversial.

Blix
This is simply a combination of bleach and fixer that some kit uses to combine two steps into one.

Blix & bleach
The times for blix and bleach can be extended up to 50% – with respect to the ones reported in the instruction booklets that come with every kit – without harm.

Ilford-style wash
It is an archival washing method devised by Ilford. Basically you fill the tank with water and turn it upside down 5 times, than you empty it. You repeat the process, but this time you turn it upside down 10 times, then you empty it. And for the last time you repeat the process, but turn the tank upside down 20 times before emptying it. That’s it; at this point you will have saved a ton of water – compared with the traditional 15′ wash – and your films will be still archival-quality clean. And yes, you can and should use it also when you process b/w films.

Stabilizer
This step has three functions: it hardens the emulsion, disinfects it agains fungus and bacterial contamination, and lets the water flow away out the film surface without forming drops.

 

After all this just hang the films to dry in a clean room – the best possible place is in the shower, after you run hot water for a minute to clean the air from flying dust particles – and come back in an hour and a half or so. Your pictures will be ready to be cut in stripes and scanned!

How to get good colors from the scans will be the argument of the next post.

 

The cheap bastard guide to (film) photography – Part V: How to digitize your pictures

The resulting image

This can be easily the most expensive part of the process. When you have to digitize your pictures there are three possible ways.

 

AN EXTERNAL SERVICE / LAB

If you’re lucky to live near a lab that still offers a good scanning service contextually the developing of the pictures – say Costco or similar – then go for it, or at least give it a try.

On the other hand, recurring to a lab to scan your pictures in a second moment can be quite expensive. Luckily we have two more options.

 

A FILM SCANNER OR A DEDICATED FLATBED

If you shoot 35mm only go for a film scanner. This days even a 3200 / 4000 model is quite cheap – often under 100€ – and the quality is usually impressive.*

With medium format you’re out of luck. Film scanners capable of accepting medium format films are often quite old and almost ever dreadfully expensive. So you’re left with a dedicated flatbed scanner.

I’ve tried both of the following, and while the first you can find it under 50€ for the V700 be prepared to pay up to 500€.

  • Epson 2450 Photo
  • Epson V700

The V700 is undoubtedly better, but not 450€ better. And frankly the results with a flatbed are disappointing anyway. You will get (some of) the beautiful tonalities of medium format film, but not the sharpness; no, not even in the ballpark. That said, if all you want is post the pictures on Flickr this may be enough.** Take a look at the two pictures below, part of a comparison I did a while ago between the Epson V700 and the digital camera method described in the next paragraph (both unsharpened 100% crops). Now you can sharpen the Epson sample to death, but it will never get as good as the first one; simply there is not enough detail to start with.

 

* You may also want to try the bellows method described later if you have a digital camera with an high-resolution sensor available.

** Now a lot of people will be angry and will say that they print the pictures scanned with the V700 mural-size. Please just take a look at the full comparison I made here

scanned with a digital camerascanned with epson 700v

A DIGITAL CAMERA WITH A MACRO LENS

If you have a digital camera and a macro lens – also a cheap but good one like the Pentax 50mm f/4 M – you can extract a ton of detail from your films, on par with a drum scan that costs 200€ a pop!

I’ve explained the process in detail here, but basically you will have to use a metal lens hood as a spacer – or just a bellow if you want to digitize only 35mm film – between the lens and the film, then shoot like you were shooting a panorama: in sections. In the computer you will then reassemble the sections and obtain the final image.

Multiple shots

If you have a digital camera but not a macro lens you can spend as little as 30€ for a 50/3,5 Nikkor pre-ai, but even having to appositely buy, for example, a Nex 3 still will be way cheaper than having to buy a (medium / large format) scanner.

And don’t forget, the quality you’ll get from your negatives will be head and shoulder compared to an under 4.000€ device. Just check the comparison I shot between this system, an Epson V700 and a Dainippon drum scanner here.

With this post we end the “cheap bastard” film photography serie. I hope to have convinced enough people to give film a try.

Now, film or digital, happy pictures to everyone!

 

The cheap bastard guide to (film) photography – Part IV: Films and developers

Films and developers - Guardia Piemontese castle

When it comes to films you really cannot be more of a cheap bastard than shoot in black and white and develop on your own. 😉

But for completeness I will examine color films as well.

Remember, this is not the “guide to the best films on the market”, but the “cheap bastard” one.

However, given that it would be foolish to skimp on the quality of film if the results were poor the recommended ones are still really good choices, in fact outstandingly so; but some of them do not make use of the last cutting edge technology.

Fujichrome Velvia - Ferns in the Sila Grande forest

COLOR FILMS

When it comes to color you have the choice between negative and slide film. Frankly shooting slides nowadays does not makes a lot of sense, that is if you intend to scan them later.

Yes, they are beautiful, but a negative has often comparable colors – no, I’m not talking about Velvia, sorry this one is quite unique – with a much larger exposure latitude.

Moreover, I was a big fan of Fuji Sensia – cheap but with beautiful colors – and now it has been discontinued.

The remaining alternatives are all quite expensive, so if you insist in shooting slides just buy the ones that can give you the looks you prefer.

For print films the situation is less grim. I would recommend:

  • Agfa Vista
  • Fuji Superia
  • The cheapest Kodak ones (they are sold under different names in different countries)

I’m also testing the Rollei Digibase, but I’ve still shot too little with this one to make a final call.

Lake Arvo

BLACK AND WHITE FILMS

With black and white films, at least for now, we can relax again given that we still have a fairly vast choice.

But, like I said, here we are “cheap bastards”, so the uncontested king, the one that rules them all is (drum roll please):

  • Shanghai GP3 100 iso

You will have to order it often directly from China, but it costs half the price of the other films – yes, shipping included – and has beautiful tonalities. It has instantly become one of my favorite films, no matter the price. The one cons it has it is that the grain is not so fine, but nothing to worry too much. Soup it in Rodinal semi-stand at 1+200 and you will be in for a treat…

Like I said, lot of alternatives here, so you may also like to try:

  • Foma Fomapan 100 Classic
  • Foma Fomapan 200 Creative
  • Ilford FP4 125 iso
  • Ilford HP5 Plus 400 iso
  • Kodak T-Max 100
  • Kodak T-Max 400
  • Kodak Tri-X 400
  • Rollei Retro 80s
  • Rollei Retro 400s

The T-Max has tabular grain, almost invisible. The other ones have more of a traditional grain structure, but to my eyes often better tonalities too.

Shanghai GP3 in Rodinal 1+200 semi-stand

DEVELOPERS

Here I got three suggestion for you, two commercially available and one to prepare on your own. But black and white developers are hundreds, and many quite cheap. So you should do your own research to see which one performs more to your likings coupled with the specific film selection of your choice.

  • Rodinal (and clones, like R9 etc.)
  • Kodak X-Tol
  • Caffenol

You can use the Rodinal up to 1+300 (yes, one part of developer for 300 parts of water) and it lasts pretty much a lifetime in a well closed bottle, so you may well infer how it is the “cheap bastard” first choice.

The Caffenol is what you think it is, a developer based mostly on coffee (or caffeic acid, to be precise). There are various recipes on the net, just do your homework while you brew and sip a cup of joe.

To the next time, when we will discuss how to digitize – yes, I purposely didn’t say scanning – your pictures.

 

The cheap bastard guide to (film) photography – Part III: Large format

Linhof Technica III second version

The large format options are more limited.

In reality there are dozens of possibility, but the larger the format the more difficult to find a good camera for a cheap price.

And the admission ticket starts to skyrocket too…

 

UP TO 150€

  • Graflex Speed Graphic (various models) with one lens
  • MPP (various models) without lens
  • An old Arca / Linhof / Plaubel 4×5 studio camera (non folding)

 

UP TO 300€

  • Bush Pressman model D with one lens
  • A Toyo / Horseman folding, without lens
  • Linhof Technika III (4×5 or 5×7) with one lens

 

UP TO 500€

  • Shen-Hao / Tachihara 4×5 without lens
  • A Toyo / Horseman folding, with one lens

A few notes

When you buy a large format camera you have to be sure that the bellows is light tight. If there are just a couple of holes, however, you may use them to get a discount, and then fix the leaks with a bit of black heavy tape or liquid rubber.

The Speed Graphic are a bit limited with regards to the movements, but are still capable of great results.

The Linhof are on the heavy side, being all metal, but tough as rocks and beautifully engineered. Various MPP models are essentially Linhof copies.

An old – but good – non folding, studio camera is difficult to carry, being heavy and large; however many great masters do just fine this way, and it is the ultimate solution for the ones who want every possible movement. Besides, if you often shoot near your car and do not hike long stretches, it is not a bid deal.

Shen-Hao and Tachihara are a beauty to behold, but are a tad pricey and, being made of wood, more delicate – but also more light.

Next time we’ll talk about films, developers and scanners.

Stay tuned.

 

The cheap bastard guide to (film) photography – Part II: Medium format

Hasselblad 500c/m

With medium format cameras the price of the admission ticket used to be pretty steep. Thankfully to the explosion of the digital craziness now you may buy cameras that costed thousand of euro for a few bucks. Keep in mind that the quality will be correlated to the original price, not the one you will pay now!

I will not include in the “up to 50€” section cheap cameras like the Holga, the Diana or the Agfa Clack; if you like the specific look they deliver they are really good, but for a first-timer in the medium format world probably not the best choice.

All the same, in the “up to 150 / 200€” section I decided to not include the Pentacon Six and the various russian cameras, because at this price point I think you may buy cameras much more reliables nowadays.

Keep in mind that more often than not you will need an external exposure meter (not with the Fuji GS645, the Pentax 645 or if you’ll buy an exposure finder). You may also use the meter of another camera, obviously, but this would mean taking more weight with you; your choice.

 

UP TO 50€

  • Rolleicord IIb / IIc with Zeiss Triotar 75/3,5

 

UP TO 150 / 200€

  • every Rolleicord with a Schneider Xenar 75/3,5
  • Fuji GS645*
  • Fuji GW690*
  • Mamiya M645 with 80/2,8
  • Mamiya RB67 with 90/3,5
  • Zenza Bronica ETR / ETRs / ETRsi with 75/2,8

* rangefinder cameras

Rolleiflex Rolleicord Vb

UP TO 400 / 500€

  • Fuji GX680 with a couple lenses and an AA battery adapter
  • Hasselblad 500c/m with Zeiss Planar 80/2,8
  • Hasselblad 500EL with Zeiss Planar 80/2,8
  • Mamiya RZ67 with 110/2,8
  • Pentax 645 with 75/2,8
  • Pentax 67 with 105/2,5 and TTL finder
  • Rolleiflex with Zeiss Planar 3,5 and meter

Rolleicord, Rolleiflex and the two Fuji rangefinder are all fixed, non-interchangeable lens cameras.

For the others you can pick a wide angle and a tele for under 300€ total, often for much less.

See you next time, with the large format options.